Federal Reserve Leadership

On May 22nd, Kevin Warsh was sworn in as the new chair of the Federal Reserve, succeeding Jerome Powell. Though Powell’s term as chair has expired, he will remain on the Board of Governors and continue to participate in policy decisions. In this new role Warsh will lead the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which is responsible for setting monetary policy through adjustments to the federal funds rate. Warsh fills the seat previously held by Stephen Miran, who departs following meetings in which he dissented 6 times in favor of easier monetary policy (lower interest rates). Miran’s exit removes one of the more dovish voices from the Committee.

Warsh returns to the Federal Reserve after serving as a member of the Board of Governors from 2006 to 2011, when he resigned in part due to concerns about the Fed’s large-scale asset purchase programs (quantitative easing) and the potential long-term inflationary risks associated with those policies. Quantitative easing is a monetary tool used by central banks to help stimulate economic growth when traditional tools, like lowering the federal funds rate, are not effective. The Fed used this measure to grow their balance sheet by purchasing U.S. Treasury, agency, and mortgage-back bonds as a means to lower interest rates.  Since leaving the Fed, Warsh has been active in academia and policy circles, including serving as a lecturer at Stanford Graduate School of Business and as a distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution.  His work has focused on monetary policy, financial regulation, central bank independence, and the limitations of unconventional policy tools such as quantitative easing.

Policy Expectations

As Chair, Warsh is widely expected to adopt a measured and disciplined approach to monetary policy.  A well-known critic of inflation and focused on the supply side of the economy, he is likely to begin his tenure with a low profile and an emphasis on improving policy discipline.  Although he has recently been characterized as more dovish, his task is complicated by inflation remaining above the Fed’s 2% target, driven in part by higher oil prices amid geopolitical tension, while the labor market remains resilient.  In this current environment, it is hard to envision the Committee pivoting toward easier monetary policy. Policy decisions will be shaped by the full Committee of twelve voting members, with the Chair responsible for building consensus. 

Market Expectations and Interest Rates

At present, Federal Funds futures markets are pricing in a higher probability of rate increases later this year, though these expectations remain highly sensitive to incoming economic data. Historically, the FOMC has tended to adjust policy in a series of moves rather than through isolated changes, making a single, standalone rate hike less likely.

The current shape of the yield curve further reflects these expectations. The spread between the federal funds rate and the 2-year U.S. Treasury yield suggests that markets expect the FOMC to raise short-term rates.  Shorter-term Treasury yields are closely tied to expected monetary policy while longer-term yields tend to reflect broader economic fundamentals, including growth, inflation and deficits.

Outlook

The Federal Reserve remains data-dependent, and at present, it is hard to envision either a rate cut or a rate hike.  Warsh will also want to demonstrate his and the Fed’s independence from political influence, reinforcing credibility with financial markets.  In the near term, the most likely outcome is a pause in policy adjustments as the Committee evaluates evolving economic conditions. Presiding over his first meeting as Fed Chair, Warsh did not submit any dot plots and held a shorter press conference than his predecessors. Less forward guidance from the fed may lead to volatility.  As a result, interest rates may remain elevated for an extended period, reflecting ongoing concerns around inflation and economic resilience.  While unconventional policy tools such as quantitative easing remain part of the Fed’s toolkit, Warsh’s prior opposition to such measures suggests that tool may not be used. While he may not lower the federal funds rate, Warsh has linked a smaller Fed balance sheet akin to rate cuts . In current interest environment, our fixed income team is maintaining a neutral duration stance versus our index.

Views are as of July 2026 and are subject to change based on market conditions and other factors. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect those of Eastern Bankshares, Inc., Eastern Bank or any affiliated entities. Views and opinions expressed are current as of the date appearing on this material; all views and opinions herein are subject to change without notice based on market conditions and other factors. These views and opinions should not be construed as a recommendation for any specific security or sector. This material is for your private information, and we are not soliciting any action based on it. The information in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is neither representation nor warranty as to the accuracy of, nor liability for any decisions made based on such information. Past performance does not guarantee future performance. Eastern Bank does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice. You should consult your legal and/or tax advisors before making any financial decisions.